In 1976, a two-term Republican president (Richard Nixon) became extremely unpopular — much more so than the current Republican president George Bush, as seen in the fact that Nixon was forced to resign from office (the only such incident in all of American history).
The Republicans were ousted from office and Jimmy Carter, hailed as a “new kind of leader,” was ushered into the Oval Office with a majority of the popular vote. The Democrats held 67.1% of the House of Representatives and 62% of the Senate — overwhelming dominance in Congress, and the presidency.
What happened next?
Well, four years later Carter lost his bid for reelection by 8 million votes, taking only 41% of those cast. Republicans had a net gain of 12 seats in the Senate, gaining control of the body. Reagan was reelected in a landslide in 1984, then, after serving two complete terms, his vice president was elected to succeed him — something that hadn’t happened since Marin Van Buren succeeded Andrew Jackson in 1837.
Carter was rejected because it turned out that his total lack of experience (he was a peanut farmer) made him far too soft on America’s enemies, especially Russia, and totally unable to carry out foreign policy. Ronald Reagan was elected with a mandate to get tough on the USSR, and his escalation of the arms race bankrupted it and drove it into the dustbin of history. Soon thereafter, Republicans recaptured control of the House of Representatives.
Those who are celebrating the possibility that Barack Obama will win the White House this year, backed up by a Democratic Congress, would do well to remember a little history. They might also consider the fact that they’ve been claiming the country is about to plunge headlong into a horrible recession; if it does, Democrats will get the blame, just as they did for the nation’s economic woes under Carter (which he famously referred to as “malaise”).
There are many unsettling similarities between Carter and Obama, except that Carter didn’t have an incendiary religious background tied to racism and extremism the way Obama does with Jeremiah Wright, something that only adds more fuel to his potential funeral pyre.
But the left doesn’t seem to care, and is settling into an orgy of arrogance and hatred over the prospect of an Obama victory. I’m always amazed at the way liberals can attack Republicans for being unwilling to speak reasonably to America’s foes, and yet adopt exactly the same attitude towards those on the right. Rather hypocritical, isn’t it?
Same thing goes for religion. You know how those on the left scoff at religion, as if anyone who believes it isn’t a fully evolved human? Suddenly, it seems, they’re changing their minds, and deciding that Barack Obama is a “lightworker.” He became so studying racism at the feet of Jeremiah Wright, I guess.
Here are a few choice bits of their analysis:
JFK wasn’t assassinated for any typical reason you can name. It’s because he was just this kind of high-vibration being, a peacemaker, at odds with the war machine, the CIA, the dark side. Umm, OK, if you say so. But, didn’t JFK launch the Bay of Pigs and the Vietnam war?
I’ve heard from far too many enormously smart, wise, spiritually attuned people who’ve been intuitively blown away by Obama’s presence - not speeches, not policies, but sheer presence - to say it’s just a clever marketing ploy. Err, maybe. But when conservatives said that about Reagan, liberals called him the “Teflon president” who was elevating form over substance, and they said they despised that. Moreover, Apparently, none of these people were in California, Texas or New York, the nation’s three largest electoral powerhouses. Obama lost them all.
Even Bill Clinton, with all his effortless, winking charm, didn’t have what Obama has, which is a sort of powerful luminosity, a unique high-vibration integrity.
That’s for sure. Because when Bill Clinton “won” the presidency in 1992, 57% of the country voted against him.
So to recap: Liberals say the country is headed for a massive recession, yet they are rejoicing about the idea of being in power when it happens. They say they favor “democracy” and yet they are rejoicing about the end of the Republican Party and the day when Americans will have no other choice but Democrats. They say religion is for cave men, but they are creating a Church of Obama.
Santayana said that those who can’t remember history are doomed to repeat it. Truer words were never spoken.
And maybe this explains why the Dumbocrats haven’t reelected a president with a majority of the popular vote since World War II.
The most accurate comparison in terms of Obama’s lack of experience was, sadly, Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was a one term congressman in the late 1840’s and was not re-elected. He spent the 1850’s as a local lawyer in Illinois until running for President in 1859-1860. I love Lincoln, am scared to death of Obama, but perhaps the experience thing is overrated. But then again, the United States and the World is completely different today than it was in 1860.
I guess you do not know this one:
“History is more or less bunk. It’s tradition. We don’t want tradition. We want to live in the present and the only history that is worth a tinker’s damn is the history we make today.”
Just in case you want to use it somewhere else, that was Henry Ford speaking to the Chicago Tribune on May 25, 1916.
Carter came to clean up the mess Nixon and the Republicans left behind. He restored trust in government. He wanted “a kinder and gentler America” even before Bush Sr. called for it. But America was not ready for that. America was still in cowboy-war mood. After Reagan and Bush Jr., most of America is really ready for “a kinder and gentler America.”
The question is, are you?
Too true! Next to Obama, Carter looks like a grey eminence! It’s quite possible that Obama is the least well qualified candidate ever nominated for the Oval Office, and he scares me too! Hopefully, the American people will show their usual good sense and repudiate him.
However, a peanut farmer from a hillbilly state hardly has any knowledge of foreign policy, and that was where Carter’s presidency foundered.
I’m curious to know why you would love Lincoln. He presided over the worst war in American history (more Americans lost their lives in it than all other American wars COMBINED) and he abolished both the writ of habeas corpus and slavery thought the constitution banned him from doing so. He forced half the country to remain part of it against its wishes, certainly the most un-American act ever taken by a U.S. president. As far as I’m concerned, he was a far worse president than George Bush could ever dream of being. Next to the civil war, Iraq is a tea party!
OK, so you are saying you have not problem if the Dumbocrats repeat 1976 with Obama? In other words, you have no problem if he’s a one-term president and the whole government shifts to the Republicans after him?
Great! We are in total agreement! I’d love to buy you a drink and toast to that!
It is something new to me, even strange, that each time you comment on my comment I have to read my comment again to see if I wrote things I did not know I wrote.
It has never happened to me.
You infer what is not there, you read meaning where there is no such meaning, and you attribute things to people that they never said. Where for instance did I say or even imply that I will be OK if Obama wins and governs for one term?
Anyway, I will still take the drink if you buy it. Unfortunately, I don’t drink vodka. Which is what I often wish I drink as I try to respond to you.